This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jones, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Beyond the Semantic ‘Big Bang’: Cultural Sociology and an Aesthetic Public Sphere

University of New South Wales, Australia

This article argues that cultural sociology should take heed of conceptual and policy ambiguities that developed within British and Australian cultural studies. However, it also proposes that cultural sociology might build on the underdeveloped common ground between Frankfurt critical theory and cultural studies. Habermas’s notion of the ‘literary public sphere’ is taken as a useful point of contact between these fields. This literary public sphere thesis is reconstructed in some detail and its fate in recent debates is explored. Habermas’s concept of the contradictory institutionalization of political public spheres is applied to the literary public sphere thesis.The article proposes that the examination of differing modes of contradictory institutionalization of literary and political public spheres might aid comparison not only of nation-states’ differing policy practices but also of intellectual traditions such as cultural studies as well.Throughout, the article advocates the relevance of a cultural production perspective to research on aesthetic public spheres.

Key Words: contradictory institutionalization • cultural production • cultural sociology • immanent critique • literary (cultural/aesthetic) public sphere • policy

References

• Adorno, T. (1991) ‘Transparencies on Film’, in J. M. Bernstein (ed.) The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge. (First published 1966.)
• Alexander, J. (2003) The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bennett, T. (1990) ‘The Sociology of Genres: A Critique’, in T. Bennett Outside Literature. London: Routledge.
• Bennett, T. (2000) ‘Intellectuals, Culture, Policy: The Technical, the Practical and the Critical’, Pavis Papers in Social and Cultural Research, no. 2, Pavis Centre for Social and Cultural Research. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
• Bennett, T., Emmison, M. and Frow, J. (1999) Accounting For Tastes: Australian Everyday Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Born, G. (1993) ‘Against Negation, for a Politics of Cultural Production: Adorno, Aesthetics, the Social’, Screen 34(3): 223-242.
• Born, G. (1995) Rationalizing Culture: IRCAM, Pierre Boulez and the Institutionalization of an Avant-garde. Berkeley, CA: UCLA Press.
• Born, G. (2002) ‘Reflexivity and Ambivalence: Culture, Creativity and Government at the BBC’, Cultural Values 6(1/2): 65-90.
• Born, G. (2004) Uncertain Vision: Birt, Dyke and the Reinvention of the BBC. London: Secker and Warburg.
• Born, G. (2006) ‘Digitizing Democracy’, Political Quarterly 76(51): 102-123.
• Boyce, G. (1978) ‘The Fourth Estate: The Reappraisal of a Concept’, in G. Boyce, J. Curran and P. Wingate (eds) Newspaper History: From the Seventeenth Century to the Present. London: Constable.
• Cohen, J. and Arato, A. (1992) Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Corner, J. (1995) Television Form and Public Address. London: Arnold.
• Delanty, G. (1997) ‘Habermas and Occidental Rationalism’, Sociological Theory 15(1): 30-59.
• Dillon, E. (2004) The Gender of Freedom: Fictions of Liberalism and the Literary Public Sphere. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Eagleton, T. (1984) The Function of Criticism: From the Spectator to Post-Structuralism. London: Verso.
• Eley, G. (1993) ‘Nations, Public and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth Century’, in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, pp. 289-339. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Eliot, T. S. (1948) Notes Towards the Definition of Culture. London: Faber.
• Foucault, M. (1991) Remarks on Marx: Conversations with Duccio Trombadori. New York: Semiotext(e).
• Fraser, N. (1993) ‘Rethinking the Public Sphere: Towards a Critique of Actually Existing Democracy’, in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, pp. 418-479. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Habermas, J. (1979) ‘The Public Sphere (an Encyclopaedia Article)’, in A. Mattelart and S. Siegalub (eds) Communication and Class Struggle, pp. 198-201. Bagnolet: IMMRC. (First published 1964.)
• Habermas, J. (1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (First published 1962. First English translation 1989.)
• Habermas, J. (1993) ‘Further Reflections on the the Public Sphere’, in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, pp. 421-461. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity. (First published 1992. First English translation 1996.)
• Habermas, J. (2006) ‘Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Espistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research’. Speech to International Communication Association Congress, Dresden, Germany. Dresden International Congress Centre, 20 June 2006.
• Habermas, J.et al. (1993) ‘Concluding Remarks’, in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere, pp. 418-479. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Hall, S. (1986a) ‘Popular Culture and the State’, in T. Bennett, Coline Mercer and Janet Woollacott (eds) Popular Culture and Social Relations. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
• Hall, S. (1986b) ‘Variants of Liberalism’, in J. Donald and S. Hall (eds) Politics and Ideology: A Reader. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
• Hall, S. and Chen, K.-H. (1996) ‘Cultural Studies and the Politics of Internationalization: An Interview’, in D. Morley and K.-H. Chen (eds) Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues. London: Routledge.
• Hartley, J. (1998) ‘That Way Habermadness Lies’, Media International Australia 88: 125-135.
• Hartley, J. and Green, J. (2006) ‘The Public Sphere on the Beach’, European Journal of Cultural Studies 9: 341-362.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
• Harvey, S. (1998) ‘Doing It My Way - Broadcasting Regulation in Capitalist Cultures: The Case of "Fairness" and "Impartiality"’, Media, Culture & Society 20(4): 535-556.[Abstract]
• Hoggart, R. (1977) ‘In the Name of Freedom’, New Society 40(768) 23 June: 617-618.
• Hohendahl, P. (1982) The Institution of Criticism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
• Hunter, I. (1988) Culture and Government: The Emergence of Literary Education. London: Macmillan Press.
• Hunter, I. (1994) Rethinking the School: Subjecivity, Bureaucracy, Criticism. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
• Inglis, D. and Hughson, J. (2003) Confronting Culture: Sociological Vistas. Oxford: Polity.
• Jacka, E. (2003) ‘Democracy as Defeat: The Impotence of Arguments for Public Service Broadcasting’, Television and New Media 4(2): 177-191.[Abstract]
• Jacobs, R. (2006) ‘American Television as a Global Public Sphere’, Paper Presented to Congress of International Sociological Association, Durban, July.
• Jameson, F. (1990) Late Marxism: Adorno or, the Persistence of the Dialectic. London: Routledge.
• Jameson, F. (1992) ‘On Cultural Studies’, Social Text 34: 17-51.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
• Jones, P. (1994) ‘The Myth of "Raymond Hoggart": On "Founding Fathers" and Cultural Policy’, Cultural Studies 8(3): 394-416.
• Jones, P. (2000) ‘Democratic Norms and Means of Communication: Public Sphere, Fourth Estate, Freedom of Communication’, Critical Horizons 1(2): 307-339.
• Jones, P. (2001) ‘The Best of Both Worlds? Freedom of Communication and "Positive" Broadcasting Regulation’, Media Culture & Society 23(3): 407-417.
• Jones, P. (2004) Raymond Williams’s Sociology of Culture: A Critical Reconstruction. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Jones, P. and Pusey, M. (2004) ‘Class and "Media Influence" in Australia’, in D. Heider (ed.) Class and News. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Knights, B. (1978) The Idea of the Clerisy in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lara, M. (1998) Moral Textures: Feminist Narratives in the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Leavis, F. (1959) ‘Introduction’, in F. Leavis (ed.) Mill on Bentham and Coleridge. London: Chatto & Windus.
• Lepenies, W. (1988) Between Literature and Science: The Rise of Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lloyd, D. and Thomas, P. (1998) Culture and the State. London: Routledge.
• McGuigan, J. (1992) Cultural Populism. London: Routledge.
• McGuigan, J. (1996) Culture and The Public Sphere. London: Routledge.
• McGuigan, J. (2004) Rethinking Cultural Policy. London: Sage.
• McGuigan, J. (2005) ‘The Cultural Public Sphere’, European Journal of Cultural Studies 8(4): 427-443.[Abstract]
• McGuigan, J. (2006) ‘Richard Hoggart: Public Intellectual’, International Journal of Cultural Policy 12(2): 199-208.
• Milner, A. (2005) Literature, Culture and Society (2nd Edition). London: Routledge.
• Milner, A. and Browitt, B. (2002) Contemporary Cultural Theory (3rd Edition). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
• Mulhern, F. (2000) Culture/Metaculture. London: Routledge.
• Schultz, J. (2005) ‘A More Diverse Media: Can the Club be Busted?’ Address to Australian Fabians, NSW Parliament House, Macquarie St, Sydney, 21 September 2005. URL (consulted 1 September 2006): http://www.fabian.org.au/868.asp
• Sherwood, S., Smith, P. and Alexander, J. (1993) ‘The British are Coming.... Again! The Hidden Agenda of Cultural Studies’, Contemporary Sociology 22(3): 370-375.
• Turner, G. (2001) ‘Reshaping Australian Institutions: Popular Culture, the Market and the Public Sphere’, in T. Bennett and D. Carter (eds) Culture in Australia: Policies, Publics and Programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ward, I. (1995) Politics of the Media. Melbourne: Macmillan.
• Watt, I. (1957) The Rise of The Novel. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
• Williams, R. (1961) The Long Revolution. London: Chatto & Windus.
• Williams, R. (1962) Communications. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
• Williams, R. (1977) ‘The Paths and Pitfalls of Ideology as an Ideology’. Times Higher Education Supplement 10 June: 13-13.
• Williams, R. (1989a) ‘Culture is Ordinary’, in R. Williams Resources of Hope. London: Verso. (First published 1958.)
• Williams, R. (1989b) The Politics of Modernism: Against the New Conformists. London: Verso.
• Williams, R. (1990) Culture and Society. London: The Hogarth Press. (First published in 1958 as Culture and Society: 1780-1950 by Chatto & Windus.)
• Williams, R. (1995) The Sociology of Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (First published in 1981 as Culture by Fontana.)

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jones, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?