This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kirchberg, V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Cultural Consumption Analysis: Beyond Structure and Agency

University of Lüneburg, Germany

The objective of this article is to explain visits to arts institutions by merging two theoretical perspectives that are generally regarded as antithetical, the model of the human being as homo sociologicus, and the model of the human being as homo oeconomicus. This article demonstrates that visits to arts institutions cannot be explained either by structural conditions or by individual choice alone, but by a combination of both. I demonstrate this by combining Bourdieu’s theory of practice and Giddens’ structuration theory to produce a reconciled model of an agency-structure-feedback loop, applying this model to analyse the societal significance of museums and museum visits. The reciprocal relationship of structure and agency connects Giddens’ agency-driven museum visitor with Bourdieu’s structure-driven museum visitor.This case of museum analysis shows that an agency-structure polarity does not reflect reality. Neither do museums (structure) fully determine museum visitors (agency) nor do museum visitors fully determine museums (structure).

Key Words: agency • cultural consumption • homo oeconomicus • homo sociologicus • museum studies • structure • structuration

References

• Adorno, T. W. (2001) The Cultural Industry. London: Routledge.
• Baudrillard, J. (1999) The Consumer Society: Myths and Structures. London: Sage.
• Beck, U. (1986) Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Edition Suhrkamp.
• Becker H. S. and McCall, M. M. (eds) (1993) Symbolic Interaction and Cultural Studies. Chicago, IL: The University Of Chicago Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Bourdieu, P. (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Coleman, J. S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
• Dahrendorf, R. (1968) Essays in the Theory of Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• DeNora, T. (2000) Music in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• DiMaggio, P. (1996) ‘Are Art-Museum Visitors Different from Other People? The Relationship between Attendance and Social and Political Attitudes in the United States’, Journal of Empirical Research on Literature, the Media and the Arts 24(2-4): 161-180.
• Durkheim, E. (1964) The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.
• Esser, H. (1993) Soziologie. Allgemeine Grundlagen. Campus: Frankfurt am Main.
• Fyfe, G. (1996) ‘A Trojan Horse at the Tate: Theorizing the Museum as Agency and Structure’, in S. MacDonald and G. Fyfe (eds) Theorizing Museums: Representing Identity and Diversity in a Changing World. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.
• Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
• Kirchberg, V. (2004) ‘Lebensstil und Rationalität als Erklärung des Museumsbesuchs’, in R. Kecskes, M. Wagner and C. Wolf (eds) Angewandte Soziologie. Festschrift für Jürgen Friedrichs, pp. 309-28. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
• Kirchberg, V. (2005) Gesellschaftliche Funktionen von Museen. Makro-meso- und mikrosoziologische Perspektiven. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
• Kirchberg, V. (2007) ‘Thinking about "Scenes": A New View of Visitors’ Influence on Museums’, Curator - The Museum Journal 50(2).
• Levi-Strauss, C. (2004) Absolute Claude Lévi-Strauss (M. Annas and M.-H. Gutberlet, eds). Freiburg: Orange Press.
• Lüdtke, H. (1989) Ungleichheit: Zur Soziologie der Lebensstile. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
• Mead, G. H. (1962) Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Opp, K. D. (1989) The Rationality of Political Protest: A Comparative Analysis of Rational Choice Theory. London: Westview Press.
• Opp, K. D. (1990) ‘Testing Rational Choice Theory in Natural Settings’, in J. J. Hox and J. de Jong-Gierwald (eds) Operationalization and Research Strategy, pp. 87-101. Amsterdam: Leiss.
• Parsons, T. (1949) The Rules of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Peterson, R. A. (1983) ‘Patterns of Cultural Choice’, American Behavioural Scientist 26(4): 422-438.[Abstract]
• Peterson, R. A. and Simkus, A. (1992) ‘How Musical Tastes Mark Occupational Status Groups’, in M. Lamont and M. Fournier (eds) Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality, pp. 152-186. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Ritzer, G. (2000) The McDonaldization of Society (revised New Century Edition). London: Sage.
• Saussure, F. de (2003) Wissenschaft der Sprache. Neue Texte aus dem Nachlass. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
• Schulze, G. (1992) Die Erlebnisgesellschaft: Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
• Soja, E. W. (1989) Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.
• Soja, E. W. (1996) Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real- and-Imagined Places. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Soja, E. W. (2000) Postmetropolis: Critical Studies of Cities and Regions. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Weber, M. (1976) Wirtschaft und Gessellschaft. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
• Wippler, R. (1990) ‘Cultural Resources and Participation in High Culture’, in M. Hechter, K. D. Opp and R. Wippler (eds) Social Institutions: Their Emergence, Maintenance and Effects. Berlin: De Gruyter.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Reddit

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Tlili Behind the Policy Mantra of the Inclusive Museum: Receptions of Social Exclusion and Inclusion in Museums and Science Centres Cultural Sociology, March 1, 2008; 2(1): 123 - 147. [Abstract] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kirchberg, V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?