This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Silva, E. Articles by Wright, D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Using Mixed Methods for Analysing Culture: The Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion Project

Open University, e.b.silva{at}open.ac.uk

Alan Warde

University of Manchester, alan.warde{at}manchester.ac.uk

David Wright

University of Warwick, d.wright.3{at}warwick.ac.uk

This article discusses the use of material generated in a mixed method investigation into cultural tastes and practices, conducted in Britain from 2003 to 2006, which employed a survey, focus groups and household interviews. The study analysed the patterning of cultural life across a number of fields, enhancing the empirical and methodological template provided by Bourdieu's Distinction. Here we discuss criticisms of Bourdieu emerging from subsequent studies of class, culture and taste, outline the arguments related to the use of mixed methods and present illustrative results from the analysis of these different types of data.We discuss how the combination of quantitative and qualitative methods informed our analysis of cultural life in contemporary Britain. No single method was able to shed light on all aspects of our inquiry, lending support to the view that mixing methods is the most productive strategy for the investigation of complex social phenomena.

Key Words: Bourdieu • cultural capital • distinction • methodology • mixed methods

Cultural Sociology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 299-316 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1749975509105536


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?